Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Maru's avatar

When I hear everyone from RFK to Huberman to Bill Maher (don`t want to say "when I listen to" because I actively try not to...), what I hear is not an interest in *health* by any of its definitions. What I hear sounds like eugenics.

Expand full comment
John Fontaine, Phm's avatar

Dr. Andrea your passion is truly laudable & I encourage your commitment to fight the good fight & continue to speak truth to truth.

I would very much appreciate your thoughts on the following which I find troubling & you mention measles in this post.

Waning maternal antibodies…

Spoiler alert we don't administer a live, albeit attenuated vaccine to pregnant women, and pregnancy should be avoided for 28 days after vaccine administration...

respectfully, I know you are aware of the preceding.

Given the sad state of global immunizations, specifically measles I have recently read (references if asked) the passive immunity from mom to newborn is not very good... convention being "protective" maternal antibodies are present ~ 9+ months post birth. However, titres are minimal within a couple months & for mom's who have natural immunity cf those vaccinated MMR are somewhat counter intuitive…even less ☹️

I am asking for a variety of reasons & coupled with the sdt of care for a pregnant women in their 2 to 3rd trimester (apparently more optimal end of the 2nd) is to be given Tdap with the intent to boost passive immunity for pertussis, should there be a paradigm shift to include a measles?? 🤔

Also if newborns are vaccinated before the recommended age, presents addition challenges for future antibody titres.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts