3 Comments
User's avatar
John Fontaine, Phm's avatar

It bears repeating, "when experts present unequal evidence as though both sides deserve equal weight, the public doesn’t hear nuance. They hear uncertainty. And uncertainty is where pseudoscience propagates".

I am disappointed to read the AAP & ACOG have not been less ambiguous. Parents & expecting mothers have many challenges to ensure they are the best guardians of their unborn & infants, etc without the confusion & guilt of what foods to fed their children.

JJF Phm 🇨🇦

Barry D Bradford's avatar

Thank you for the article. As a curious person I search for credible information, and it can be a daunting task!!

Maru's avatar

This substack (below) is about the same dynamic. She writes that many doctors are on board for peptides in an irresponsible way and those who want them are flipping the argument back at people who supported vaccines about doctors representing "[the] science." So if you trusted them for vaccines you should trust them for peptides. Scary and frustrating times:

https://substack.com/home/post/p-203721362